Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Poor and Hispanic

Hey Guys,

Here's an interesting article that was published in the LA Times. Just as we've seen all along in class, race and environment have inevitable long-term effects on all of our lives. For these poor Hispanic families, there's no avoiding the severity of the impact of the environment on their lives.


latimes.com

Grieving Kettleman City mothers tackle a toxic waste dump

Each had miscarried or given birth to a child with birth defects. Their pain gave them strength to fight for justice.

By Louis Sahagun

April 1, 2010

Reporting from Kettleman City, Calif.

On a rainy afternoon in a cramped trailer, the five homemakers listened as state officials with clipboards asked personal questions: Did they or their husbands smoke, drink or take illicit drugs? Had they been exposed to pesticides or other toxic substances in the United States or Mexico? Do their families have histories of birth defects?

Each had miscarried a fetus or given birth to a child with severe birth defects within the last three years. Each suspected it had something to do with a nearby toxic waste facility.

"You want to know if we ever smoked cigarettes or took drugs," Maura Alatorre said bitterly. "But I'm telling you that if the dump is allowed to expand, we'll suffer more damage and illness. Why? Because we are poor and Hispanic. The people who issue those permits don't care about us getting sick from it because all they think about is money."

Magdalena Romero added, "Kettleman City to them is just a pigsty, but we are human beings, and we have rights."

Kevin Reilly, chief deputy director of the state Department of Public Health, smiled tensely. "This is only the start of a full investigation," he said, weighing his words. "But to be very honest, we may not be able to find answers for each of you."

A year ago, these Mexican immigrants were shy, unquestioning. Not anymore. In less than a year, they have overcome their fears of government officials and placed this farmworker community, one of the poorest in the state, on the national stage.

Romero's daughter, America, who was born with a cleft palate and other serious health problems, died in 2007 when she was 4 1/2 months old. Alatorre's 2-year-old son, Emmanuel, is missing part of his brain and cannot keep his balance. Daria Hernandez's 1-year-old son, Ivan, has had two surgeries related to his cleft palate and other problems. Maria Saucedo's daughter Ashley died when she was 10 months old. A fifth woman, Lizbeth Canales, miscarried a fetus with heart problems and clubbed feet and hands.

"The first time I spoke out in public against the chemical dump, I felt so scared and embarrassed that my heart was pounding and I was shaking so hard I could barely speak," Romero recalled. "Today, I am a braver woman. . . . Once, our little pueblo felt lost and abandoned. In recent weeks, we have won great victories. We have a long way to go, but we will never tire."

Finding answers won't be easy. The Kings County community of 1,500 has for decades been surrounded by agricultural sewage, diesel exhaust, pesticides sprayed on adjacent fields and orchards, elevated levels of arsenic in drinking water and tons of dangerous substances hauled each day into the landfill 3 1/2 miles southwest of town.

Kettleman City is one of many small towns across the United States struggling with serious health problems that residents believe have environmental causes. Few get the answers they seek.

"In many of these communities, the number of cases is so small -- and in such small populations -- that the issues are not resolvable by statistical analysis," said Dr. Dean Baker, president of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology and director of the Center for Occupational and Environmental Health at UC Irvine. "What I find fascinating about Kettleman City, however, is the confluence of events that has led to a massive response from state and federal authorities.

"It takes almost heroic people at the local level to make these things happen," Baker said.

Kettleman City, a municipality in name only, lies just off Interstate 5, equidistant from Los Angeles and San Francisco. It has no stop signs, sidewalks or streetlights. The per capita income is about $7,300 a year. Homes and trailers rent from $600 to $800 a month, and many have broken windows, ripped screen doors and peeling paint.

Water runs brown as coffee from many household taps. Residents buy potable water at local vending machines for $1.75 a gallon. The nearest supermarkets and pharmacies are about 15 miles away in Avenal.

Most residents work for low wages in the Central Valley on farms and in orchards. It is unknown how many people here are illegal immigrants, but the number is thought to be substantial. Only 225 people are registered to vote. Politicians rarely visit.

Local officials, however, frequently tour the landfill, where diesel big rigs from Southern California annually dump 400 tons of hazardous substances, including paint, acid and toys from China contaminated with lead.

Each year, the facility's owner, Waste Management Inc., pays $3 million in taxes and disposal fees into Kings County's general fund.

Waste Management officials said they welcome the state study. The landfill has been an integral part of the Kings County community for 28 years and is monitored, regulated and controlled by nearly a dozen local, state and federal agencies, owners note.

In those 28 years, the company has been fined more than $2 million for infractions, including mishandling of carcinogenic polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs; failing to properly analyze incoming wastes, storm water and leachate for PCBs; and failing to properly calibrate equipment.

A year ago, the company applied for a county permit to expand. Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice, a San Francisco environmental group long opposed to the landfill, conducted an informal health survey, turning up at least five cases of birth defects among 20 babies born between September 2007 and November 2008. Three of them had died.

"My daughter, America, was the first of the babies born with a cleft and other problems," Romero recalled in a tense, even voice.

"Until the day she was born, the doctor told me she was fine. She was 4 1/2 months old when she died. At first, I thought it was an act of God. Then I started hearing about the others."

It wasn't easy for them to go public. "I met with the moms individually," recalled Greenaction community organizer Ana Martinez. "They were anxious. Some cried. I said, 'This is a big fight against a terrible problem. We must get government agencies to understand. You can actually do something about that. We'd like to get all of you together.' "

The women eventually agreed. On Aug. 12, 2009, under the watchful eyes of Kings County Sheriff's Department deputies and police dogs, they waited their turn to address federal, state and local regulatory authorities at a hearing in the Kettleman City Community Center.

When Saucedo's name was called, however, she broke down in tears. Romero went to the podium instead, so nervous she could hardly breathe.

"I, on behalf of all the parents here, ask that you help us, that you listen to us and that you don't continue permitting more expansions here," Romero said in a quavering voice. "Many children are being born with illnesses, many miscarriages are happening."

Bolstered by the experience, the women showed up at more than a dozen county hearings, where they held up enlarged color photographs of the babies' oral deformities. The photos became their calling cards at demonstrations and contentious Kings County hearings.

"Some people said we were crazy," Saucedo said, shaking her head in anger. "They said our babies' birth defects never happened, that we got our photographs off the Internet or that they were pictures of the same baby taken from different angles."

Frustrations mounted over the county and state agencies' failure to act on the birth defects. All that changed when reporters began asking probing questions in late 2009. Yielding to pressure from the community, Kings County officials in December requested a door-to-door state investigation into health problems. State health officials rejected the request because, they said at the time, the situation did not warrant one.

On Dec. 22, the Kings County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the permit to expand the landfill.

Greenaction and a local group, the People for Clean Air and Water, sued county supervisors, saying they had not adequately addressed the project's effect on the community's health. Dozens of residents traveled by bus 200 miles to demonstrate on the steps of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in San Francisco.

"Before we left for San Francisco, my oldest daughter asked, 'Mom, why do we have to go to this thing?' " Romero recalled. "I said, 'It's for America, your sister in heaven. Get in the bus.' "

U.S. EPA regional administrator Jared Blumenfeld ordered his office to review its oversight activity involving the landfill and promised to go to Kettleman.

On Feb. 3, Romero awaited him on a lumpy gray couch facing the front door and a living room window with a 2-foot crack patched with silver duct tape. She was flanked by her children and clutched a large white photo album to her chest.

"The first thing I'm going to do is tell him that it is a great victory and honor to have him here in my home," she said. "I'm going offer him a glass of water -- bottled water. Then I'm going to show him these photographs of my daughter. I'm going to tell him that I'm not sure what happened to her, but I think it's the dump."

Soon after Blumenfeld left, a curious crowd pressed around the five women in the middle of the town's main drag, General Petroleum Street. Saucedo spoke first. "He promised to do all he can do to help," she told the gathered throng, including media from distant cities. "Personally, I won't be happy until that dump is moved to the other side of the world." Saucedo showed no trace of the fear that had driven her to tears some six months earlier.

Results of the state study will be released later this year. In the meantime, Romero, Alatorre, Hernandez, Saucedo and Canales grieve. They pray for guidance and strength at home altars adorned with candles, porcelain angels, renderings of Our Lady of Guadalupe, and photographs of their babies.

Romero keeps a lock of America's hair in a small white envelope. Saucedo leaves red roses on Ashley's grave. Saucedo's husband has a tattoo of Ashley's disfigured face on his left arm.

"All we want is for someone to tell us what is going on with our babies," Maria Saucedo said.

louis.sahagun@latimes.com

THE DANCE OF RACE AND ENVIRONMENT welcomes guest dancers Jacoh Cortes and Humberto Gutierrez.
As special offering to Stanford, Jacoh will re-create LA DANZA DEL VENADO, performing the celebrated role with which he toured internationally with Amalia Hernandez' Ballet Folklorico De Mexico. Jacoh is only the second hand-picked successor to the originator of this version, the renowned Jorge Tiller and thus represents a living legacy. Please join us in appreciation of this powerful dance ritual, which will be offered during our presentation of ELEMENTS OF LIFE Wed evening June 2nd beginning at 7 pm !

Intersection of Race and the Environment

BLACK PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT
THE ENVIRONMENT!
I have definitely heard this statement many times. And after careful consideration, I would prefer people say that the popular environmental issues are not seen as relevant in the lives of many Blacks in America. The popular environmental issues are centered around global warming and things of that nature. This isn't that pertinent to a Black kid being told he has ADD and he should take special classes. Especially if education is poor at his school, the teachers don't care, and his text book paints slavery as if it were a slap on the wrist to inferior beings.
In this stuation I think the phrase, "The battle is not yours" is extremely applicable. That child's immediate concern is the right to equal education that is balanced. The education and criminal justice system aren't so nice to minorities. Those minorities are my friends and family. They have to deal with discrimination almost around every corner. As a kid my mother told me you have to be twice as good as White people in order to achieve an equal playing field.
A reason why you don't see many Blacks for environmental issues is that fight -- like feminism -- is seen as a luxury. It is a sad thing that most minorities are unaware of Environmental racism and how it impacts them. They know that the landfill next door is pumping chemicals in their environment, but they don't know how much it affects them and that the placement is intentional. It has been said that the best place to place dangerous buildings is near an area where people won't speak up -- urban, uneducated environments.
You don't really see many White people signing up to protest putting hazardous sites is predominantly Black neighborhoods. Why? Cause it would place it in their neighborhoods. Can you blame them? And it doesn't directly affect them almost how certain global issues don't directly affect Black people.
If asked in High School about my thoughts on the environment, wouldn't have thought of the trees and grass. Tension and segregation would have came to mind. That was my environment, that is what I saw everyday, and that is what I cared about. So because my environment is different, does that make it any less valued?

Revenge of the Environment

In a section of the performance I play the Earth responding to ungrateful humans constantly using my resources. A powerful line in that portion is

How many natural disasters does it take to get through to you people!!

This quote definitely hits home when my hometown was recently hit by
an immense amount of rain resulting in record flooding.
Are natural disasters the Earth's form of retalliation?
If so, what did Tennessee do to deserve such devestation?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/weather/05/05/tennessee.flooding/index.html

Monday, May 24, 2010

COME ONE COME ALL !




Please come join us
for ELEMENTS OF LIFE ; FACES OF RACES IN MULTIPLE SPACES !!!

A free public presentation of our creative process, created by project participants of THE DANCE OF RACE AND ENVIRONMENT

with special guest artists:
- muralist Joaquin Newman ( www.forrealism.com)
- famed Deer Dancer Jacoh Cortes, former principal dancer of Ballet Folklorico De Mexico

WHERE : Meet us at the Chumway Fountain ( aka Halo aka Red Fountain)
WHEN : Around 7 pm on WEDNESDAY June 2 ;
THEN WHAT ? ... We will roam from site to site on campus ( Law School Lawn, Meyer Library Steps, The Claw, White Plaza, the Grove, Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden)

WITH >>>
Sound, Movement, Dialogue, Interactive Games ( twisted Twister based on Race and Environment Labels - left leg on Blue if you are , " black", "white", "green" !!) , Poetry, Participatory Chalk Art Masterpieces, Recycled and Stolen costumes, Snacks, Random beatings by Border Patrol, and.... surprises! We will conclude with a celebratory feast at Harmony House..

I hope you can join us !

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Bringing Home the Border Schedule

Make sure you all come out! FREE FOOD, art, dance, poetry, song, and best of all, SOCIAL JUSTICE!

5:00-5:10pm -- Welcome and Appetizers
5:10-5:20pm -- Dance of Race and the Environment class performance

5:20-6:00pm -- Immigration Awareness Forum
Stanford students highlight issues of immigration reform relating to education, poverty, health, sustainability, and other social issues.
Student speaker: Heather Buckelew
Arizona Alternative Spring Break slideshow
Other student and community speakers
Audience participation in collective art project and activism

6:00-7:00pm -- Art & Music Affair
Members of the Stanford community will share artwork relating to immigration issues in the form of still or performance pieces, including poetry, paintings, drawings, song, and dance.
Dinner served
Clips from a local day worker-produced documentary, "La Espera"
Spoken word performances by Stanford Spoken Word Collective member Ayana Wilson, Stanford and Collective alum Liane al-Ghusain, and student Erica Fernandez
A musical performance by Talisman's Shantelle Williams

7:20-8:00pm -- Activities Fair/Informal Artist Showcase (in the arcades of Old Union Courtyard)
Co-sponsoring groups will be able to set up booths or tables at the end of the event to spread awareness about their causes and recruit new members.
Student artists Stephanie Muscat and Cesar Armando will be painting on-site during the event.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

PICTURES relevant to our work




POSTED BY: Ariel Mazel-Gee
Please Note the date is actually WEDNESDAY May 26, not thursday may 26 !!

Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment

Here's a link to the website of this awesome local group-check them out. They deal with issues around Air Quality, Clean Water, Civil Rights, etc. If anyone is looking for a way to continue working in this field I bet they would be a great resource!

http://www.crpe-ej.org/

-Polly

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Race, Environment, AIDS

Hey Everyone,

This is an article about the AIDS epidemic around the world and a weakening of our willingness to fight that battle due to the current economy. The article does not specifically refer to race and environment, but with the high rates of AIDS in many of these countries, environment, and invariably race, are closely related to your chances of survival. Much of this has to do with financial resources, but unfortunately many of the poorer areas that will experience a sharp increase in deaths tend to have high populations of minority races.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/world/africa/10aids.html?hp

The Hidden Power of Culture

Post Submitter: Ariel Mazel-Gee

An interesting article about the influence of culture on how people think!

The Hidden Power of Culture

The society in which we live influences the way our brain perceives the world

By Corey Binns


Culture influences the songs we sing, the steps we dance and the words we write. It also shapes our brains. Scientists have long known that neuroplasticity allows individual events to sculpt the brain’s form and function. Now there is evidence that life experience as intangible as culture can also reorganize our neural pathways. Recent research has found that culture influences the way a person’s brain perceives visual stimuli such as scenes and colors.

In one study, psychologists showed people 200 complex scenes, such as an elephant in a jungle or an airplane flying over a city, while scanning their brains with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The team, led by Denise C. Park of the University of Illinois, studied young and elderly subjects from the U.S. and Singapore. For Westerners of all ages, the images triggered activity in a part of the brain asso­ciated with object recognition called the lateral occipital region, whereas the same object-associated areas were not activated in the older Asians’ brains.

“An Asian would see a jungle that happened to have an elephant in it,” Park explains. “Meanwhile a Westerner would see the elephant and might notice the jungle.” Because the Asian subjects’ responses differed between the two generations, while the older Americans matched the youths in their interpretation of the landscapes, the researchers concluded that the culture people grow up in plays a role in how they interpret what they see.

Language, says Stanford University cognitive scientist Lera Boroditsky, helps to convey and maintain a culture’s conventions—and similarly affects perception. In an unrelated study, she found that Russian speakers, whose language includes two words that make a mandatory distinction between light blue and dark blue, could more quickly distinguish between shades of the color than English speakers could. In this case, language meddled in the simple task of differentiating among hues. With an infinite number of ways to perceive the world, Boroditsky says, every culture’s guidebook helps to focus our brain’s attention on the characteristics most important to our life.

Post Submitter: Ariel Mazel-Gee

Thursday, May 6, 2010

The Founding of Tenochtitlan (Javier's Origin Story)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenochtitlan

Tenochtitlan (Classical Nahuatl: Tenōchtitlān [tenoːtʃˈtitɬaːn]) (sometimes paired with Mexico as Mexico Tenochtitlan orTenochtitlan Mexico) was a Nahua altepetl (city-state) located on an island in Lake Texcoco, in the Valley of Mexico. Founded in 1325, it became the seat of the growing Aztec empire in the 15th Century, until captured by the Spanish in 1521. It subsequently became a cabecera of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, and today the ruins of Tenochtitlan are located in the central part of Mexico City.


History

Mexico City statue commemorating the foundation of Tenochtitlan.

Tenochtitlan was the capital city of the Aztec civilization, consisting of the Mexica people, founded in 1325. The state religion of the Aztec civilization awaited the fulfillment of an ancient prophecy: that the wandering tribes would find the destined site for a great city whose location would be signaled by an eagle eating a snake while perched atop a cactus. The Aztecs saw this vision on what was then a small swampy island in Lake Texcoco, a vision that is now immortalized in Mexico's coat of arms and on the Mexican flag. Not deterred by the unfavourable terrain, they set about building their city, using the chinampa system (misnamed as "floating gardens") for agriculture and to dry and expand the island.

Religion and the Environment - PBS video

In my research for information on race/ethnicity and environment, I stumbled across a PBS article and video about religion, particularly Christians, and the environment. I found it extremely interesting to look at interactions with the environment that were not along racial lines. Below is the article and link to the pbs site where you can view the video.

RELIGION & ENVIRONMENT

What's so important about the potentially powerful influence of conservative evangelical Christians on environmental issues, especially global warming? For years, many of these evangelicals have been charging environmentalists-and those progressive Christians who support environmentalism-with idolatry for lavishing worship on "God's creation" rather than God. Moreover, they have been skeptical, if not downright hostile, toward government-mandated protection of the environment.

So as President Bush early in his administration initiated efforts to roll back a slew of federal environmental regulations-including safeguards on clean air and water and protections against commercial logging and drilling on public lands, among others-and withdrew American support for the Kyoto treaty on global warming, he knew he could count on conservative evangelicals to remain firmly in his corner.

But changes are afoot. In February 2006, a group of 86 respected evangelical Christian leaders from across the nation unveiled a campaign for environmental reform and put out a statement calling on all Christians to push for federal legislation that would reduce carbon dioxide emissions in an effort to stem global warming. This Evangelical Climate Initiative, which has helped publicly solidify a nascent environmentalism in the evangelical community, also intends to lobby federal legislators, hold environmental meetings at churches and colleges, and run television and radio ads that link drought, starvation, and hurricanes to global warming.

"The same love for God and neighbor that compels us to preach salvation through Jesus Christ, protect the unborn, preserve the family and the sanctity of marriage, and take the whole Gospel to a hurting world, also compels us to recognize that human-induced climate change is a serious Christian issue requiring action now," their statement read in part.

But weeks before the Climate Initiative's statement was released publicly, another group of high-profile evangelicals was working to quash it. In a January 2006 letter to National Association of Evangelicals, whose affiliated churches and ministries were considering taking a stand against global warming, these leaders warned that "global warming is not a consensus issue, and our love for the Creator and respect for His creation does not require us to take a position."

So how did conservative evangelicals, who tend to present a unified front on most matters of political significance, end up in such a public breach? And what effect might the growing commitment among evangelicals to combat global warming and other environmental perils have on the 2006 congressional races and the 2008 presidential election?

Explore these conservative evangelical issues and learn how other faiths view their obligation to the planet-and let us hear your voice-in the MOYERS ON AMERICA Religion & the Environment Citizens Class.

Join the Citizens Class discussion.

Grist

Keep up to date on the world around you.
Check out environmental news from GRIST!







http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/green/environment.html


jazmin holmes

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

How to Solve Illegal Immigration

Yay! I finally got onto the blog.
Check out this interesting (and rather cute) video about how to solve illegal immigrations. It presents some really interesting perspectives that you may not have considered before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN1kp1ggWyM

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

James Cameron Joins Indigenous Struggles Worldwide...

Mmmm... personally I have some mixed feelings of the man and the movie, but if he is willing to reach out then props to him... he definitely has the following to make a difference if he's serious about doing so =)
~E


http://www.indypendent.org/2010/04/26/avatar-activism/

‘AVATAR’ ACTIVISM: James Cameron Joins Indigenous Struggles Worldwide
By Jessica Lee
April 26, 2010 | Posted in IndyBlog
By Jessica Lee

NEW YORK CITY—Blockbuster Hollywood director James Cameron said that he is committed to helping indigenous peoples around the world who, like the fictitious Na’vi in his film Avatar, are “caught at the tectonic interface between the expansion of our technical civilization into the few remaining preserves of this planet.”



Several months after the release of Avatar, which quickly became the top grossing film of all time, and two days after the release of the DVD on Earth Day, Cameron was invited to speak at two events on April 24 that were associated with the Ninth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues taking place in New York City from April 19-30.
James Cameron joins the panel discussion, “Real Life ‘Pandoras’ on Earth: Indigenous Peoples Urgent Struggles For Survival,” held at the Paley Center for Media in Midtown Manhattan April 24, 2010. Also on the panel from left to right: Tonya Gonnella Frichner, co-chair and North American Regional Representative of U. N. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues; Karmen Ramirez Boscan, representing Wayu communities in Colombia; Oren Lyons, Faithkeeper, Onondaga Nation and board member of the Seventh Generation Fund; and Atossa Soltani, executive director of Amazon Watch (not shown in photo).
James Cameron joins the panel discussion, “Real Life ‘Pandoras’ on Earth: Indigenous Peoples Urgent Struggles For Survival,” held at the Paley Center for Media in Midtown Manhattan April 24, 2010. Also on the panel from left to right: Tonya Gonnella Frichner, co-chair and North American Regional Representative of U. N. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues; Karmen Ramirez Boscan, representing Wayu communities in Colombia; Oren Lyons, Faithkeeper, Onondaga Nation and board member of the Seventh Generation Fund; and Atossa Soltani, executive director of Amazon Watch (not shown in photo).

“I’d just like to say it is a tremendous honor for me to be here,” Cameron said in his introduction to a special evening screening of Avatar to some 400 people from the indigenous forum at the New York Directors Guild Theatre in Midtown Manhattan. “I applaud what you [at the forum] are doing. It is so critical given how many indigenous cultures are under threat throughout the world.”

Cameron said that he has been astonished by the response to the film and said that many indigenous communities and environmental organizations have contacted him seeking his help and support.

“It has been very, very interesting for me in the last couple of months to see how many people have come to [my wife] Susie and myself asking if there is something we can do in association with Avatar because so many people around the world working with indigenous issues have seen their reality in the film — even though the film is a fantasy that takes place on a mythical world — people are seeing their reality through the lens of this movie.”

While he said that he had never worked with indigenous people before in his life, he says he is now very committed to helping illuminate these struggles worldwide. “I never really dreamed that a Hollywood film could have that significant of an impact,” Cameron said on panel discussion earlier in the afternoon, “Not only is this is an opportunity, it is a duty. I do have a responsibility now to go beyond the film, because it doesn’t teach, and to become an advocate myself and use what media power I have to raise awareness.” (click the link for full article)

Photography Exhibition on Diversity, Compassion, Tolerance this May at Stanford

Hello! I was in the art building yesterday and saw a flyer for an upcoming photography exhibition that purportedly deals with themes of Diversity, Compassion, and Tolerance in a Multi-cultural world. It seems like it should be in line with a lot of the themes of this class, at least in terms of dialogue about race and ethnicity. I don't remember too many of the details about it, but I'm pretty certain the exhibition is showing on campus (yay accessibility!). After I finish work tonight around 8pm, I'll go back to the art building, find out the exact details, and post them here.

--Christine Platt

Responses to Arizona Immigration Law

Entry by Jazmin Holmes

By a Stanford Professor....
Legalization must be part of immigration reform

A path to citizenship for those already here illegally is crucial.

Tomás R. Jiménez
April 29, 2010

Opponents of comprehensive immigration reform argue that legalization rewards bad behavior. They contend that illegal immigration is a crime that merits punishment and expulsion, not amnesty. The logic is that if we respond with tough enforcement, illegal immigrants will finally get that they aren't welcome here and go back to their home countries. This kind of reasoning is what's behind laws like the one recently passed in Arizona, which requires law enforcement personnel to determine whenever possible the immigration status of suspected illegal immigrants.

But immigrants aren't going home. We know this from experience. Despite high-profile raids, beefed-up border enforcement and the worst economy since the Depression, the size of the illegal immigrant population has declined by only a small fraction. At this pace, the time it would take to realize the pipe dream of removing illegal immigrants through forced and voluntary deportations could be measured in light-years.


Given that immigrants are here to stay, it is in everyone's interest for them to assimilate — to learn English, embrace U.S. social and civic customs and become part of the economic fabric. And if that is the goal, we need to have immigration reform that goes beyond fences, high-tech surveillance, more Border Patrol officers and a guest worker program. We need a path to legalization for those who have built lives here.

Why? Because illegal status inhibits not only the assimilation of those who are here illegally but of future generations who are U.S.-born citizens. Research has consistently found that illegal immigrants and their descendants have a much tougher time gaining a social and economic foothold.

On the other hand, we know that legalization has a positive effect on assimilation. The legalization program contained in the last major immigration overhaul, the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, facilitated the assimilation of millions of immigrants and their children. A 2007 Merage Foundation report written by UC Irvine sociologists shows that the children of formerly illegal immigrants who obtain green cards face a brighter future and stand to contribute much more than those whose parents remain undocumented.

According to the study, U.S.-born Mexican Americans whose fathers came illegally but later obtained legal permanent residency were 25% less likely to drop out of high school, 70% more likely to graduate from college, 13% more likely to prefer English at home, and their earnings were 30% higher than those whose fathers were illegal at the time of the survey.

Part of what holds the children of illegal immigrants back is that they can never quite look forward. Parents cannot fully participate in their children's lives in ways that help them realize their full potential. As children enter adulthood, many have to take care of the financial needs of their immigrant parents, whose illegal status makes them extremely vulnerable to the vagaries of the job market, the healthcare system and housing. The situation is worse for those who were brought as young children to the United States without documentation. They suffer from the double penalty of their parents' and their own illegality.

As Congress drags its feet on immigration reform, illegal immigrants continue to put down roots and the ranks of children who suffer the penalties of their parents illegal status swells. According to a recent Pew Hispanic Center report, almost half of all illegal immigrant households are couples with children, and the overwhelming majority of the children — 73% — are U.S. citizens. The number of U.S.-born children with at least one illegal immigrant parent grew to 4 million in 2008 from 2.7 million in 2003, a 48% increase. Another 1.5 million children with at least one illegal immigrant parent are themselves illegal.

Withholding legalization imposes slow social and economic death on illegal immigrants and their children. Failure to implement comprehensive immigration reform leaves thousands of people who consider the United States their home in the shadows. It also deprives us of the opportunity to develop a better-trained workforce and to realize all the benefits, both social and economic, that a fully assimilated immigrant population can contribute. Legalization is the most crucial component of what Americans need and what they deserve: comprehensive immigration reform.

Tomás R. Jiménez is an assistant professor of sociology at Stanford University and an Irvine Fellow at the New America Foundation. He is the author of "Replenished Ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity."



also... on the other side of the argument... a stanford student...

Get it Right: “Undocumented” sounds nice–”Illegal” is accurate

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010 | By Erica Morgan
Wall Street may enjoy a brief period of respite from the role of perfidious villain in the blame game propagated by the President in the coming weeks. The rules of this game are simple: assign culpability for the nation’s problems to some arch-nemesis. Previously, the position of Public Enemy No. 1 has been filled by President Bush (what can’t we blame on him), CIA interrogators (abusing helpless terrorists), health care insurance providers (greedy profit-seeking charlatans), Tea Partiers (raising Cain by quoting the Constitution…oh no!) and finally New York bankers (they single-handedly brought down the highly regulated “free” market…oxymoron?). However, the bankers may be able to continue their nefarious activities while their regulators watch porn at the taxpayers’ expense, at least for a short while, as a new blackguard threatens to wreak havoc on the greatness of our nation.

Arizona governor Jan Brewer had the audacity last Friday to sign into law a bill that reinforces federal illegal immigration laws. Having heard hysterical cries of “racism” and “apartheid” on the news waves, I decided to investigate the new law in an attempt to decipher how, in Obamaspeak, it threatens to “undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans.”

The law prohibits Arizona officials from limiting “the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law.” It requires officials to determine immigration status if there is suspicion of illegality. It makes illegal immigration a state crime (note: it is already a federal crime). It prevents illegal immigrants from working in Arizona. For the record, under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, any citizen of any country who “(1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact” has committed a federal crime.

Given the existing federal statute, I wonder how exactly the “misguided” Arizona governor (along with the 70 percent of the “misguided” population that supported the bill) is violating American “notions of fairness?” Outraged predictions of racial profiling fly in from the left as commentators like Reverend Al Sharpton boldly declare, “we will bring freedom walkers to Arizona…we cannot sit by and allow people to be arbitrarily and unilaterally picked off as suspects because of the color of their skin.”

The race card has been played too many times. As Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce said, “illegal is not a race; it’s a crime.” Arizona shares a border with Mexico. Thus, it is not surprising that the majority of illegal border crossers are Mexican. Acknowledging this fact, and suggesting that the laws of our nation actually be enforced, is not a coordinated attack on people of Mexican heritage. It is an attempt to protect the rights of American citizens and legal immigrants.

According to ImmigrationCounters.com, the money wired to Mexico since January of 2006 amounts to more than $28.9 billion. There are approximately 22.7 million illegal aliens in the country, who have incurred social service costs of $397 billion since 1996. How is that demonstrating “fairness” to the American taxpayers providing these social services?

Small wonder that Mexico is displeased with the new law. The government of Mexico, in a two-page statement, laments that “legislators that approved this bill and the Governor of Arizona did not take into account the valuable contributions of [illegal] immigrants to the economy, society and culture of Arizona and the United States.”

Nobody is discounting the contributions of immigrants to the nation. How is it unjust to require that those who benefit from life in America do so legally? How is it racist to suggest that protecting the rights of American citizens trumps protecting non-citizens? It is ridiculous to claim that anti-illegal immigration laws are unconstitutional when, by definition, illegal aliens are not protected by the constitution.

Erica is equally displeased with illegal Canadian immigrants. Commiserate? Emorgan1@stanford.edu.